LAW
Text Box: BACK
Text Box: HOME
GUIDE TO THE 2007 LAWS - CHANGES AFFECTING DIRECTORS
12C1(c) The concept of'weighted' adjusted scores becomes the norm in England. It has been in place since 2000 as
  an option but it now replaces the current law 12C2.
  12C1(e) DOES NOT APPLY IN ENGLAND.
   
  Example; Due to an infraction the TD disallows a score of 4 by E/W and puts it back to 4♥ by N/S. there is
  a 50/50 chance that N/S will make 10 or 11 tricks, so the TD can award 50% of 4♥ = and 50% 0f 4♥ + 1.
  See the White Book p27 for full details. An article will follow in a future in English Bridge
25B In the current (1997) code there is a little known law that allows you to make a call and then 'change your
  mind'. It was quite a well kept secret and had a strange penalty where you could play for at most 40% after
  you had done it. In the new laws that has gone. You can still make a 'mechanical error' and be allowed to
  change it (L25A) but you cannot change your mind. By and large a bid made cannot be changed.
27 This is both complicated to explain and may be difficult to apply. There is a significant change to the 
  insufficient bid law. The scope for allowing an insufficient bid (IB) to be replaced without silencing partner has
  been extended. The old rule of replacing it at the lowest legal level remains, provided that both bids (the IB
  and replacement bid) are natural. But there is now an added possibility, which comes if a replacement call 
  can be found which has the same ,eaning, or a more precise meaning as the IB itself.
   
  Confused? Well, Max Bavin has come up with a useful question that TDs should ask, which might help to make
  it easier to decide. " Would all hands making the replacement call also have made the original call in correct
  circumstances?" If the answer is yes then the change is allowed.
   
  Here are a few examples;
  West                           North                   East                    South
                               1                                1                       1♦                                                                         
  EAST/WEST play Precision Club, so 1 shows 16+ HCP and, without interference, 1 shows 0-7 HCP. Can East
  replace his 1 bid by double if he has 5 - 7 points? They play that over interference pass shows 0 - 4 HCP and
  double shows 5 - 7 HCPs.
  Would all hands playing Precision Club that would now double also have bid 1 without interference?
  Yes, so the change can be made and partner can continue bidding. Note that in this case pass would also be
  okay if East had 0 - 4 points.
 
  West                           North                   East                    South
                               4NT                                5                       5♣                                                                         
  4NT was Blackwood, East missed the 5 bid and 5 showed 0 or 4 aces. East/West play DOPI over
  (double shows no ace, pass shows 1 ace). Can East replace 5 by double? Yes, all hands that would double
  to show no ace, would also have bid 5  without the interference.
40 This law confirms a number of things already in EBU regulations. It also confirms that you cannot have any
  aide-memoires or aids to calculation. So you cannot, for example, during the play take out the bidding card
  to see what 4xx + 2 will score for you.
64 The criteria for transferring tricks after an established revoke is changed. The TD no longer has to look at
  whether 'an additional trick was won by the offending player with a card that could legally have been played
  to the revoke trick', Instead he adjudicates either two tricks or one trick as now, and then looks to see
  whether equity has been served. Deciding whether equity has been served becomes the norm. It always
  was, but is now even more important that the TD considers it.
70 The claim laws acknowledge that, even though play should cease after a claim, it often does not and the TD
  is given help on how to proceed.
70,71 The claim and concession laws still refer to action that would be careless or inferior for the class of player
  involved, but the bit about being 'irrational' has been removed.
80 The Laws recognise a body called the Tournament Organizer which could be the Club,the County Association,
a Congress or Holiday Organizer or the EBU itself and sets out the duties and responsibilities. It replaces
the Sponsoring Organisation in the current laws.
 © The English Bridge Union